Hubstaff alternative

A Hubstaff alternative your team won't resent

Same capabilities you came for — automatic time tracking, activity levels, app tracking, optional screenshots, projects and tasks. Two differences that matter: consent is enforced by the server, and you can run the whole thing on your own infrastructure.

  • Self-hostable
  • Consent-first by design
  • Employee sees the same data
  • Chat included

Free to start · No credit card · Windows desktop agent

Why teams go looking for an alternative

Hubstaff is a capable, mature product, and for a lot of teams it is the right answer. The searches that lead people here are fairly consistent about what is missing, though: a cheaper option as headcount grows, a self-hosted or open-source option for data-residency reasons, and something staff push back on less.

Quillclock is built around those three, not around out-featuring anyone.

How they compare

CapabilityQuillclockHubstaff
Automatic activity levelsYesYes
App & window trackingYesYes
Optional screenshotsYes, per employeeYes
Projects & tasksYesYes
Built-in team chatYesNot core to the product
Employee self-service portalYes, same data as the adminLimited
Consent enforced server-sideYes — ingest rejected without itPolicy-based
Self-hostable on your own serverYesNo — cloud only
Your own databaseYesNo

Competitor capabilities change often — check Hubstaff's current plans and pricing directly before deciding. We deliberately do not quote their prices here, because any number we publish will be out of date.

The difference that actually changes adoption

Monitoring rollouts fail on people, not features. Surveys consistently find most employees believe monitoring does not improve their productivity, and a substantial share say they would consider leaving over it. When staff resent the tool, they work around it, and the data you are paying for stops being trustworthy.

Quillclock's answer is symmetry. Every employee accepts a monitoring invite before a single sample is stored — the server rejects data otherwise — and every employee gets a portal showing exactly what their manager sees. The agent is visible while it runs. Keystrokes are counted, never recorded.

If you were searching for the self-hosted version

A large share of people looking for a Hubstaff alternative are specifically after a self-hosted or open-source one — and the open-source options mostly stop short of screenshots plus automatic activity levels. Quillclock runs on your own server with your own MongoDB instance, with those features intact.

See self-hosted employee monitoring for deployment detail.

Frequently asked questions

Is Quillclock a free Hubstaff alternative?+

You can start free, and self-hosting means you are not paying a per-seat cloud fee as your roster grows. Check the current plans for what the hosted option includes.

Can I self-host it, unlike Hubstaff?+

Yes. Hubstaff is cloud-only. Quillclock is a Next.js app with a MongoDB database that you can deploy on your own infrastructure, so activity data and screenshots stay on servers you control.

Does it have screenshots and activity levels like Hubstaff?+

Yes — per-minute activity levels derived from keyboard and mouse counts, foreground app and window tracking, and optional periodic screenshots enabled per employee.

Is it also an alternative to Time Doctor or ActivTrak?+

It addresses the same job. Time Doctor and ActivTrak have both repositioned toward workforce analytics; Quillclock stays focused on accurate, consented time and activity tracking with the option to self-host.

How hard is it to switch?+

Set up the server, add employees, and send invites. Each employee installs one Windows executable, signs in, and accepts. There are no config files or agent keys to distribute, so a small team can move in an afternoon.

Try it free — no credit card